Journal of The Academy of Clinical Microbiologists

Register      Login

VOLUME 25 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2023 ) > List of Articles

MINI REVIEW

Option appraisal of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time of flight systems for a diagnostic microbiology laboratory

Anish Pyne, Sanjay Bhattacharya

Keywords : Cost, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation-time of flight, MBT Sirius IVD, option appraisal, VITEK mass spectrometry

Citation Information : Pyne A, Bhattacharya S. Option appraisal of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time of flight systems for a diagnostic microbiology laboratory. 2023; 25 (1):8-15.

DOI: 10.4103/jacm.jacm_4_23

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd.


Abstract

A major challenge for a clinical diagnostic bacteriology/mycology laboratory is to identify the causal microorganism to the species level within a limited time frame. Conventional microbiological techniques such as culture, Gram stain, biochemical tests and molecular tests like 16S rRNA analysis can take days to yield the desired result. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) system serves as a potential solution as it can provide accurate identification results within minutes. While several MALDI-TOF MS instruments are in the market, choosing the right system and comparing all the relative pros and cons can be difficult. Our present study focuses on this aspect as we have performed an option appraisal between two leading MALDI-TOF MS instruments, namely the MBT Sirius IVD system (Bruker) and the VITEK-MS system (Biomerieux). We have discussed all the parts of MALDI-TOF systems in detail followed by a cost analysis categorising the total cost into capital and consumable cost which will provide clarity of the estimated budget. We have also discussed the principle involved in organism identification and have compared the two systems concerning technology, accuracy, database, optimal operating conditions, etc. This article aims to provide readers with a better understanding of MALDI-TOF systems and facilitate informed decision-making regarding the acquisition of such systems.


PDF Share
  1. El-Bouri K, Johnston S, Rees E, Thomas I, Bome-Mannathoko N, Jones C, et al. Comparison of bacterial identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and conventional diagnostic microbiology methods: Agreement, speed and cost implications. Br J Biomed Sci 2012;69:47-55.
  2. Doern CD. Charting uncharted territory: A review of the verification and implementation process for matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization – Time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for organism identification. Clin Microbiol Newsl 2013;35:69-78.
  3. Singhal N, Kumar M, Kanaujia PK, Virdi JS. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: An emerging technology for microbial identification and diagnosis. Front Microbiol 2015;6:791.
  4. Vrioni G, Tsiamis C, Oikonomidis G, Theodoridou K, Kapsimali V, Tsakris A. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry technology for detecting biomarkers of antimicrobial resistance: Current achievements and future perspectives. Ann Transl Med 2018;6:240.
  5. Lévesque S, Dufresne PJ, Soualhine H, Domingo MC, Bekal S, Lefebvre B, et al. A side by side comparison of Bruker Biotyper and VITEK MS: Utility of MALDI-TOF MS technology for microorganism identification in a public health reference laboratory. PLoS One 2015;10:e0144878.
  6. Lee HS, Shin JH, Choi MJ, Won EJ, Kee SJ, Kim SH, et al. Comparison of the Bruker Biotyper and VITEK MS matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry systems using a formic acid extraction method to identify common and uncommon yeast isolates. Ann Lab Med 2017;37:223-30.
  7. Mather CA, Rivera SF, Butler-Wu SM. Comparison of the Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems for identification of mycobacteria using simplified protein extraction protocols. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:130-8.
  8. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Rolain JM, et al. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: Routine identification of Bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:543-51.
  9. Li B, Zhu C, Sun L, Dong H, Sun Y, Cao S, et al. Performance evaluation and clinical validation of optimized nucleotide MALDI-TOF-MS for mycobacterial identification. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:1-10. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1079184.
  10. Lau AF. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight for fungal identification. Clin Lab Med 2021;41:267-83.
  11. Dupont D, Normand AC, Persat F, Hendrickx M, Piarroux R, Wallon M. Comparison of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems for the identification of moulds in the routine microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect 2019;25:892-7.
  12. Sun Y, Guo J, Chen R, Hu L, Xia Q, Wu W, et al. Multicenter evaluation of three different MALDI-TOF MS systems for identification of clinically relevant filamentous fungi. Med Mycol 2021;59:81-6. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myaa037.
  13. Tang M, Yang J, Li Y, Zhang L, Peng Y, Chen W, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for the direct identification of clinical pathogens from urine. Open Med (Wars) 2020;15:266-73.
  14. Rychert J. Commentary: Benefits and limitations of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for the identification of microorganisms. J Infect 2019;2:1-5.
  15. Bonk T, Humeny A. MALDI-TOF-MS analysis of protein and DNA. Neuroscientist 2001;7:6-12.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.