Journal of The Academy of Clinical Microbiologists

Register      Login

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2017 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Role of line probe assay in detection of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis/multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: The experience from Kerala state, India

Praveen Sanker, Anjana Satheesan, Anusree P Ambika, Ravikrishnan Balakrishnan, Hisham Moosan, Sunil Kumar Mrithunjayan

Keywords : Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis, line probe assay, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, MGIT culture and Lowenstein–Jensen culture

Citation Information : Sanker P, Satheesan A, Ambika AP, Balakrishnan R, Moosan H, Mrithunjayan SK. Role of line probe assay in detection of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis/multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: The experience from Kerala state, India. 2017; 19 (1):12-18.

DOI: 10.4103/jacm.jacm_65_16

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 17-08-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd.


Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on use of line probe assay (LPA) for detection of TB and Rifampicin resistance among extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) patients under specific TB control programme settings. Our aim was to compare the positivity of LPA with Lowenstein–Jensen (LJ) and Bactec MGIT and to test its utility in faster testing and in patients on treatment. METHODOLOGY: The data of all 387 EPTB samples processed in two years by the state-level accredited laboratory in 2013–2014 were selected for the study. The laboratory used standard N-acetyl-L-cysteine – sodium hydroxide processing method for all samples except for cerebrospinal fluid and urine samples before conducting Ziehl-Neelsen smear microscopy, LPA and culture on both LJ and MGIT. Those samples with a negative LPA result if culture positive was subjected to a second LPA as per laboratory protocol. Doubtful Rifampicin resistant (RR) results were cleared by phenotypic testing by MGIT. Anti-TB treatment (ATT) duration was correlated with positivity of these tests later. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: LPA done on 321 processed samples out of 387 EPTB samples identified eight RR cases among 136 positive results within two to four days. Performing LPA on culture positive isolates identified an additional seven RR cases, thus reducing turn-around-time by two to eight weeks for the susceptibility results. It also demonstrated far better positivity in smear negative (15.2%) and in smear positive samples (74.3%) compared to culture methods as the test demonstrated clearly, better positivity among patients on ATT for more than two months. CONCLUSION: LPA in association with culture is an excellent combination with very good results in rapid identification of EPTB along with detection of Rifampicin resistance. LPA gives far superior positivity compared to MGIT and solid cultures among patients under ATT.


PDF Share
  1. Ministry of Health, Government of India. TB India 2015, Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program, Annual Status Report, Central TB Division. New Delhi: MOH, GOI; 2015.
  2. Vadwai V, Boehme C, Nabeta P, Shetty A, Alland D, Rodrigues C. Xpert MTB/RIF: A new pillar in diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis? J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:2540-5.
  3. Sharma SK, Mohan A. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res 2004;120:316-53.
  4. World Health Organization. Improving the diagnosis and treatment of smear negative pulmonary and extra pulmonary TB among adults and adolescents. Recommendations for HIV prevalent and resource constrained settings. Stop TB Department, Department of HIV/AIDS. World Health Organization; 2006. Available from: www.who.int/tb/publications/2006/tbhiv_recommendations.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 May 23].
  5. Lawn SD, Zumla AI. Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis using the Xpert(®) MTB/RIF assay. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2012;10:631-5.
  6. Ajantha GS, Shetty PC, Kulkarni RD, Biradar U. PCR as a diagnostic tool for extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:1012-5.
  7. Hillemann D, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Richter E. Evaluation of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for rifampin and isoniazid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains and clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:2635-40.
  8. Bai Y, Wang Y, Shao C, Hao Y, Jin Y. GenoType MTBDRplus assay for rapid detection of multidrug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0150321.
  9. Ling DI, Zwerling AA, Pai M. GenoType MTBDR assays for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2008;32:1165-74.
  10. Peter JG, Theron G, Muchinga TE, Govender U, Dheda K. The diagnostic accuracy of urine-based Xpert MTB/RIF in HIV-infected hospitalized patients who are smear-negative or sputum scarce. PLoS One 2012;7:e39966.
  11. WHO. Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary TB in Adults and Children. Policy Update; 2013. Available from: www.who.int/tb/publications/xpert-mtb-rif-assay-diagnosis-policy-update/en/. [Last accessed on 2017 May 23].
  12. Chandir S, Hussain H, Salahuddin N, Amir M, Ali F, Lotia I, et al. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: A retrospective review of 194 cases at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 2010;60:105-9.
  13. Sandgren A, Hollo V, van der Werf MJ. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the European Union and European Economic Area, 2002 to 2011. Euro Surveill 2013;18. pii: 20431.
  14. Daley P, Thomas S, Pai M. Nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis: A systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2007;11:1166-76.
  15. Chakravorty S, Sen MK, Tyagi JS. Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by smear, culture, and PCR using universal sample processing technology. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:4357-62.
  16. Hillemann D, Weizenegger M, Kubica T, Richter E, Niemann S. Use of the genotype MTBDR assay for rapid detection of rifampin and isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:3699-703.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.