Journal of The Academy of Clinical Microbiologists

Register      Login

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2016 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Prognosis and outcome of exogenous bacterial osteomyelitis: A prospective cohort study

Shanimole Puthenpurayil Ebrahimkutty, KL Sarada Devi, K Arun, Ramani Bai Joseph Theodore

Keywords : Amputation, bone curettings, exogenous osteomyelitis, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, orthopaedic implant

Citation Information : Ebrahimkutty SP, Devi KS, Arun K, Theodore RB. Prognosis and outcome of exogenous bacterial osteomyelitis: A prospective cohort study. 2016; 18 (1):22-31.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-1282.184758

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 17-08-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd.


Abstract

Background and Objectives: Exogenous osteomyelitis frequently follows traumatic or surgical inoculation of bacteria into bone and surrounding tissue. It is usually associated with open fractures, surgical implants, orthopaedic fixation devices and vascular insufficiencies such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular diseases and presence of foreign bodies. The aim of this study was to identify the pathogenic bacteria causing osteomyelitis and to evaluate the prognosis and outcome of patients with exogenous osteomyelitis. Materials and Methods: Patients admitted with clinical and radiological features of exogenous osteomyelitis were selected for the study from June 2005 to October 2006. Bone curettings or aspirated materials from the sinus tract were collected. The specimens were cultured on appropriate media for bacterial culture. The patients who consented were followed up for 6 months to record their progress and outcome. Those followed up included both culture positives and negatives. Results: Out of 125 cases of osteomyelitis, 75 (60%) were positive by culture, 59 (78.7%) were monomicrobial infections and 16 (21.3%) were polymicrobial infections. Staphylococcus aureus, 56 (60.8%) in number, was the predominant organism isolated followed by Escherichia coli, eight (8.7%); Klebsiella pneumoniae, seven (7%); Pseudomonas aeruginosa, five (5.4%); β-haemolytic streptococci, four (4.4%); Proteus mirabilis, three (3.2%); Enterococcus faecalis, two (2.2%); Acinetobacter baumannii, two (2.2%); Corynebacterium jeikeium, one (1.1%); Staphylococcus epidermidis, one (1.1%); Proteus vulgaris, one (1.1%); Kingella species one (1.1%) and Arcanobacterium species, one (1.1%). Out of the coagulase-positive staphylococci, 29 (51.8%) were Methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Of the 61 cases that were followed up, 44 cases were culture positive. The total cure rate was 60.2%. Conclusion: Appropriate antibiotic therapy after culture and sensitivity has a major role in treating exogenous osteomyelitis in the presence of fracture and instability of bone. In spite of appropriate surgical correction, the major risk factors that led to recurrence of infections and amputations were overcrowding in wards, extensive tissue injury, poor economic status of patients, non-availability of drugs in the hospital pharmacy, poor compliance of patients and drug toxicity.


PDF Share
  1. Browner BD, Levine AM, Jupiter JB, Trafton PG. Chronic osteomyelitis. A text book of skeletal trauma, basic science, management and reconstruction. Vol. 2. Saunders; 2003. p. 483-8.
  2. Berbar EF, Steckelberg JM, Osman DR. Osteomyelitis. Mandell, Douglas and Bennet Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 6th ed. vol.1. USA: Elsevier; 2005. p. 1322-32.
  3. Lew DP, Waldvogel FA. Osteomyelitis. Current concepts. N Engl J Med 1997;337:428.
  4. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com. [Last accessed on 2004 Jul 24].
  5. Fang RC, Galiano RD. Adjunctive therapies in the treatment of osteomyelitis. Semin Plast Surg 2009;23:141-7.
  6. Lazzirin L, Mader JT, Calhoun JH. Current concepts and Review. Osteomyelitis in Long Bones. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2004;86;2305-18.
  7. Salvana J, Rodner C, Browner BD, Livingston K, Schreiber J, Pesant E. Chronic osteomyelitis: Results obtained by an integrated team approach to management. Conn Med 2005;69:195-202.
  8. Nelson CL. Introduction. In: McCollister Evart C. Surgery of the Musculoskeletal System. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p. 4299-300.
  9. Cierny G 3rd. Classification and treatment of adult osteomyelitis. In: McCollister Evarts C. Surgery of the Musculoskeletal System. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p. 4337-79.
  10. Mayberry-Carson KJ, Tober-Meyer B, Smith JK, Lambe DW Jr., Costerton JW. Bacterial adherence and glycocalyx formation in osteomyelitis experimentally induced with Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 1984;43:825-33.
  11. Longo D, Kasper DL, Jameson JL, Fauc AS, Hauser SL, Loscalzo J. Osteomyelitis. Harrison"s principles of Internal Medicine.18th ed. vol. 1. McGraw Hill Education; 2011.
  12. Pier GB, Ramphal R. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennet, Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 6th ed., Vol. 2. USA: Elsevier; 2005. p. 2602-3.
  13. Tice AD, Hoaglund PA, Shoultz DA. Risk factors and treatment outcomes in osteomyelitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;51:1261-8.
  14. Shanson DC. Bone and joint infections. Microbiology in Clinical Practice. 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth and Heinmann; 1999. p. 305-8.
  15. Moreillon P, Yok-Aique, Philippe. [including Staphylococcal toxic shock]. Mandell, Douglas, and Benne, Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 6th ed., Vol. 2. USA: Elsevier; 2005. p. 2321-4.
  16. Winn WC Jr., Allen SD, Jauda WM. (ABMM). Introduction to Microbiology, Aerobic and Facultative Anaerobic Bacilli, Koneman's Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 807-8.
  17. Swiontkowsk MF, Hanel DP, Vedder NB, Schwappach JR. A comparison of short- and long-term intravenous antibiotic therapy in the postoperative management of adult osteomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999;81:1046-50.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.