Journal of The Academy of Clinical Microbiologists

Register      Login

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2015 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Role of diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli in children

Sunita Singh, Mastan Singh, Pratibha Kumari, Romi Singh Rana

Keywords : Children, diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli, enteroaggregative E. coli, enteropathogenic E. coli, enterotoxigenic E. coli, multiplex polymerase chain reaction, pathotype

Citation Information : Singh S, Singh M, Kumari P, Rana RS. Role of diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli in children. 2015; 17 (1):19-24.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-1282.158788

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 15-07-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd.


Abstract

Background and Objectives: Diarrhoea is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among children under 5 years. Study was aimed to evaluate the role of different categories of diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) in children <5 years of age hospitalised for acute/persistent diarrhoea, by multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for simultaneous detection of five categories of DEC using eight virulent genes and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of DEC. Materials and Methods: Faecal samples from 355 children with and 150 children without diarrhoea were collected from 2011 to 2013 from King George Medical University and Balrampur Hospital of Lucknow district, Uttar Pradesh, India and were tested for enteric pathogens using conventional diagnostic methods and molecular methods. Results: DEC was detected in 152 (42.81%) children with and 14 (9.33%) in children without diarrhoea respectively. The most common pathotype was enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) in cases and controls (16.05% and 5.33%), followed by enteropathogenic E. coli (12.67% and 2.66%), enterotoxigenic E. coli (8.73% and 1.33%), enteroinvasive E. coli (5.35%/and nil) in cases and controls respectively, enterohaemorrhagic E. coli was not detected in any of the diarrhoeal samples. DEC isolates showed a low rate of sensitivity to Ampicillin (07.89%), Amoxycillin-Clavulanic acid (06.57%), Trimethoprim/Sulphamethaxazole (20.39%), Nalidixic acid (24.34%,), Ciprofloxacin (34.34%), Ceftriaxone (23.68%)), Chloramphenicol (33.55%) and Cefoxitin (30.26%) while they were more sensitive to Amikacin (65.78% sensitive), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (61.84% sensitive) and Gentamicin (61.84% sensitive). Interpretation and Conclusions: DEC strains are a significant cause of diarrhoea in children. EAEC was the most frequent pathotype in the study. The high level of antimicrobial resistance in our study raises a broader discussion about the indiscriminate use or misuse of antibiotics and the risks of empirical antibiotic therapy in children of a very young age.


PDF Share
  1. Feng P, Weagant SD, Jinneman K. Bacteriological Analytical Manual. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Ch. 4A. U.S. Food & Drug Administration; 2001. Available from: http://www.911emg.com/Ref%20Library%20ERG/FDA%20Bacteriological%20Analysis.pdf. [Last updated on 2001 Oct 10; Last cited on 2015 Jan 14].
  2. Dutta S, Guin S, Ghosh S, Pazhani GP, Rajendran K, Bhattacharya MK, et al. Trends in the prevalence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli among hospitalized diarrheal patients in Kolkata, India. PLoS One 2013;8:e56068.
  3. Ballal M, Ramamurthy T. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli diarrhea in Manipal. Indian Pediatr 2005;42:722-3.
  4. O'Ryan M, Prado V, Pickering LK. A millennium update on pediatric diarrheal illness in the developing world. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis 2005;16:125-36.
  5. Kimata K, Shima T, Shimizu M, Tanaka D, Isobe J, Gyobu Y, et al. Rapid categorization of pathogenic Escherichia coli by multiplex PCR. Microbiol Immunol 2005;49:485-92.
  6. Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004;2:123-40.
  7. UNICEF/WHO. Diarrhoea: Why Children are Still Dying and What Can be Done. New York: UNICEF and the World Health Organization; 2009.
  8. Fraser AG, Collee JG, Marmion BP. Mackie and McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology. 14th ed. New Delhi: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.
  9. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966;45:493-6.
  10. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-First Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M100-S21. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2011.
  11. Vilchez S, Reyes D, Paniagua M, Bucardo F, Möllby R, Weintraub A. Prevalence of diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli in children from León, Nicaragua. J Med Microbiol 2009;58:630-7.
  12. Dhanashree B, Mallya PS. Detection of shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) in diarrhoeagenic stool & meat samples in Mangalore, India. Indian J Med Res 2008;128:271-7.
  13. Jiang ZD, Greenberg D, Nataro JP, Steffen R, DuPont HL. Rate of occurrence and pathogenic effect of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli virulence factors in international travelers. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:4185-90.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.