Journal of The Academy of Clinical Microbiologists

Register      Login

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2014 ) > List of Articles

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Use of blood agar along with Lowenstein-Jensen media for rapid isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for early drug susceptibility testing

Sangita Rajdev, Aarohi Patel, Summaiya Mulla

Keywords : Blood agar, Lowenstein-Jensen medium, Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Citation Information : Rajdev S, Patel A, Mulla S. Use of blood agar along with Lowenstein-Jensen media for rapid isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for early drug susceptibility testing. 2014; 16 (2):100-103.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-1282.144737

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 15-07-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd.


Abstract

Aims: Tuberculosis diagnosis is still a challenge in resource-limited settings due to poor sensitivity of available tests, long time to reporting and costs. Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium is the most commonly used semisolid medium for culture of Mycobacterium species. However, the growth is very slow which delays the reporting. Hence, there is a need of other better medium for obtaining rapid growth of Mycobacterium species, where advanced automated systems are not available. The aim of the present study was to assess the use of blood agar for primary isolation of Mycobacterium as well as to compare the time required for growth on blood agar and LJ medium. Materials and Methods: All clinical specimens were processed by N-acetyl-L-cysteine-sodium hydroxide decontamination method and inoculated on blood agar slants and LJ medium. These slants were observed daily for any growth. Ziehl-Neelsen stain and auramine phenol stain were used to identify acid-fast bacilli. Time taken for any visible growth on both media were recorded and compared. Results: Totally 94 samples were examined, 13.8% showed acid-fast bacilli in smears. The combined culture positivity with blood agar and LJ media was 12.7%. Mean time to detect macroscopic colonies of Mycobacterium species on blood agar was 20 ± 6 days when compared to 30 ± 5 days on LJ medium. Conclusion: Blood agar slants can be used as a good supportive media to LJ medium for rapid growth of Mycobacterium species, especially in small laboratories of developing countries where automated systems are not available.


PDF Share
  1. Boum Y 2 nd, Orikiriza P, Rojas-Ponce G, Riera-Montes M, Atwine D, Nansumba M, et al. Use of colorimetric culture methods for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates from sputum samples in resource-limited settings. J Clin Microbiol 2013;51:2273-9.
  2. Lin SY, Desmond E, Bonato D, Gross W, Siddiqi S. Multicenter evaluation of Bactec MGIT 960 system for second-line drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:3630-4.
  3. Drancourt M, Carrieri P, Gévaudan MJ, Raoult D. Blood agar and Mycobacterium tuberculosis: The end of a dogma. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:1710-1.
  4. World Health Organization. Laboratory Services in Tuberculosis Control Part III Culture. Global Tuberculosis Programme. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1998. p. 47-52.
  5. Lu D, Heeren B, Dunne WM. Comparison of the Automated Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube System (BACTEC 960/MGIT) with Löwenstein-Jensen medium for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2002;118:542-5.
  6. Coban AY. Blood agar validation for susceptibility testing of isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and streptomycin to Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. PLoS One 2013;8:e55370.
  7. Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme. Manual for sputum smear fluorescence microscopy.
  8. World Health Organization. Laboratory Services in Tuberculosis Control: Part II: Microscopy. Global Tuberculosis Programme. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1998. p. 27-32.
  9. Gil-Setas A, Mazon A, Alfaro J, Idigoras P. Blood agar, chocolate agar, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:4008.
  10. Drancourt M, Raoult D. Cost-effectiveness of blood agar for isolation of mycobacteria. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2007;1:e83.
  11. Mathur ML, Gaur J, Sharma R, Solanki A. Rapid culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on blood agar in resource limited setting. Dan Med Bull 2009;56:208-10.
  12. Josephine S, Nagaraju D. Comparison of culture methods for the rapid growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Med Lab Technol India 2012;7:8-9.
  13. Falconi FQ, Suárez LI, López Mde J, Sancho CG. Comparison of the VersaTREK system and Löwenstein-Jensen medium for the recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Scand J Infect Dis 2008;40:49-53.
  14. Coban AY, Cihan CC, Bilgin K, Uzun M, Akgunes A, Cetinkaya E, et al. Blood agar for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis against first-line drugs. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2006;10:450-3.
  15. Vildan AO, Nurbanu S, Aygün O, Nur Y, Suheyla S, Ayse Y. A comparison of two different fluorochrome stains for the detection of acid-fast bacilli in sputum specimen. Turk J Med Sci 2011;41:411-7.
  16. Casal M, Gutierrez J, Vaquero M. Comparative evaluation of the mycobacteria growth indicator tube with the BACTEC 460 TB system and Löwenstein-Jensen medium for isolation of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1997;1:81-4.
  17. Thornton CG, MacLellan KM, Brink TL Jr, Passen S. In vitro comparison of NALC-NaOH, tween 80, and C18-carboxypropylbetaine for processing of specimens for recovery of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:3558-66.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.