• Users Online: 542
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 92-95

Detection of bacterial DNA in infected body fluids using 16S rRNA gene sequencing: Evaluation as a rapid diagnostic tool


Department of Microbiology, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. S R Ramya
Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jacm.jacm_19_18

Rights and Permissions

CONTEXT: Rapid detection of pathogens in infected body fluids will help in establishing an aetiological diagnosis, thereby facilitating specific therapy. Molecular methods have an advantage over conventional bacteriological techniques in particularly identifying slow-growing, fastidious or non-cultivable organisms. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of 16S rRNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting bacterial pathogens in body fluids and compare with conventional culture methods. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This study was done at the Clinical Laboratory of the Department of Microbiology. This was a cross-sectional study design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive samples which included synovial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, ascitic fluid and pleural fluid received in the laboratory during the study period were subjected to PCR for 16S rRNA using specific primers and conventional culture by standard protocol. Samples which were positive for 16S rRNA were sequenced to identify the organism. Results of sequenced products were compared in terms of number of organisms, with culture isolates. RESULTS: The detection rate of 16S rRNA PCR was at 13% as compared to culture at 3% (P = 0.0009). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the PCR were 100% and 89.7%, respectively. The concordance of PCR and culture for both identical positive and negative samples was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The 16S rRNA PCR proved to be rapid method for detection of bacterial pathogens in body fluids. It may be a valuable tool in the diagnostic armamentarium for differentiating bacterial infection from others and starting empiric treatment.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed528    
    Printed45    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded7    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal